|
previous topic :: next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tinyE

Since 21 Jan 2006
2004 Posts
not really an
XTreme Poster
|
|
|
Kodiak

Since 01 Aug 2005
1114 Posts
Slidey
|
Tue Jul 15, 08 9:55 am |
|
|
| Thankfully winds aloft don't have much to do with the surface winds though. Pilots always need this info whenever planning a flight. Civilian pilots especially when deciding what altitude to fly for best performance. I would guess the FAA also tries to use this to sped up commercial travel. If not I would assume a commercial pilot would be able to request a different altitude to optimize the fuel consumption. I am sure Nak would know. |
|
|
Nak

Since 19 May 2005
4316 Posts
Camas
Site Lackey
CGKA Member
|
Sun Jul 20, 08 11:02 pm |
|
|
Sorry for the late reply, ben a busy few days!
Jim's right, winds aloft don't relate directly to surface winds. Probably figures into the forecast somewhat? But you'd need to be a meteoroligist to use the info I think...
The FAA really dosen't care about fuel economy, but we do of course. We have our own meteorology dept at NWA that takes datalinked info from all of our flights so that we get the latest info. Other airlines use the winds aloft forecasts and pireps (pilot reports) to figure the best altitudes. On longer legs, routing is figured with the winds too. Crossing the Pacific, our route might vary by three or four hundred miles North or South to get the best winds... |
|
|
|