 |
|
previous topic :: next topic |
Author |
Message |
stringer

Since 31 Jul 2007
694 Posts
Chucktown
Flying Tomato
|
Tue Feb 05, 08 1:06 pm Camera Lenses for kiteboarding |
|
|
I'm kind of new to slr photography, and want a wide angle zoom lens.
I was wondering what everybody uses for their kiteboarding wide angle stuff.
I have a Canon film system and I am planning on getting an EOS 20D (1.6x crop).
What wide angle zoom lenses would work well for both the film and digital bodies?
How wide do I need to go for kiteboarding shots?
Currently my widest lens is the Canon 28-105mm
Some lenses I found that might work:
Sigma 15-30mm
Sigma 12-24mm
Sigma 17-35mm
Tamron 17-35mm
What are your thoughts?
|
|
|
railgrab

Since 29 Mar 2005
177 Posts
Seattle, WA
Stoked
|
Tue Feb 05, 08 1:46 pm |
|
|
Unless you're shooting scenic landscape stuff, you'll need water protection for your camera if you're shooting 28mm and wider. My housing fits a 20mm lens (full frame sensor). Most of the time, riders are too far away, but the pros and media pets know how to get in close! Here's a sample uncropped shot of a rider making a close pass within a few feet of me. I don't have a 1.6x crop sensor to show you... Ethan
 |
Fadley in LV, January 2008 |
fadleyfullframe.jpg |
|
|
|
tautologies
Since 24 Aug 2006
602 Posts
Oahu
Addicted
|
Wed Feb 06, 08 11:58 pm |
|
|
Hey, agreed if you want wide angle get a housing for your camera..otherwise you will have to crop way too much.
I actually wasn't willing to put up the cash for a housing way way more than the cam was.....so I got a Canon G9 with housing for about $600 I think..although I have not taken it out with the housing yet, it takes SURPRISINGLY good pics. I am actually amazed at the quality it produces. You have all the manual adjustments, I guess the only thing you don't have is the flexibility with the lenses, but with an optical zoomn at about 6x optical zzom and F2.8-4.8. You can even shoot in RAW and it ias IS both of which was the deciding factors for me. Funny thing..when shooting movies you can actually see the IS work.
I do think they have upped the lense quality compared to any other PaS cam I have ever used before.
Anyhow..in general it seems to me that in terms of lenses you get what you pay for. I would consider the the new XSi, instead of the the 20D, as the technology changes rapidly...but of course this is my take..the 20D does have better weather proofing, but the there are some major steps taken in the lower consumer camera bodies.
Also, in terms of lenses, read up on them. Most of the lower end wide angle lenses will have a significant amount of distortion, but a lot seems to perform pretty well even so.
The speed of the lens, the wide aperature matters a lot, unless you always take pics in perfect sunny conditions...so look for something with a wide aperature...of course they cost more...but if you have F2.8 or lower it is fast enough for you to have a high shutter speeds..to freeze even speedy moves in a if not super cloudy then at least not super sunny either...
I know this is all self evident, but a good lense can really make the difference between a complete failure and a super nice shot. I have not done a lot of kiteboarding pics, but from other things I have shot. I am looking at a few wide angle lenses now, but I am not sure if I can afford them right now (damn it).
Anyhoo..read up on the reviews online...you'll find it.
(damn it I always write too much).
A.
|
|
|
stringer

Since 31 Jul 2007
694 Posts
Chucktown
Flying Tomato
|
Thu Feb 07, 08 1:08 am |
|
|
Good advice tautologies, but not what i'm really looking for.
I understand how lenses work, and what to look out for as far as quality goes.
I just really would like to know what are the preferred focal lengths, and if anyone has any suggestions for lenses that would work for digital and film.
So far 20mm seems cool, but 20*1.6=32mm=only medium wide.
Too bad I cant afford a FF dlsr
To get that effect I would need a 12.5mm, which makes the 12-24mm look appealing.
How wide should I go considering lenses of comparable quality?
As far as waterproofing goes, do I need a legit housing, or are there cheaper ways to effectively "splashproof" the camera? (besides buying a k10d)
Seeing as I don't plan on going underwater with it.
Keep in mind that money is an issue, and having already gone down that road, piont and shoot cameras are not an option (already have panasonic fz20).
Thanks
|
|
|
stringy

Since 23 Jun 2006
1734 Posts
vancouver
XTreme Poster
|
Thu Feb 07, 08 8:42 am |
|
|
I use a sigma 10-20 in my water housing. I know I will want closeup shots so I use this lens. At 10, it gives the image a slight fisheye effect, but not too noticable. Cropping usually resolves this. I found that if I set the lens to 10, riders really need to get close and then they are too close with water spray hitting the lens. Hard to avoid if they are that close. at 14, I can have them get close, but place them where spray is at a mimimum, but still it can be an issue. Spray can be a cool effect for your inital shot of a sequence, but it will ruin the remaining shots of the sequence.
I recently built a water housing and it is not designed to allow adjustment while in the water. Most of my shots with the housing are around the 12-14 range. 20 doesn't seem to be enough. When on land, I would obviously want a telefoto, but for a cool wide shot 10mm makes a nice wide shot.
I have made a inexpensive water housing in the past that seems to work well with a larger lens. If you want to see some pictures of a "cheap" housing just send me a pm.
stringy
_________________ www.jimstringfellow.com |
|
|
tautologies
Since 24 Aug 2006
602 Posts
Oahu
Addicted
|
Thu Feb 07, 08 1:22 pm |
|
|
stringer wrote: | Good advice tautologies, but not what i'm really looking for.
I understand how lenses work, and what to look out for as far as quality goes.
|
sorry, yes I know I just got carried away
Quote: |
As far as waterproofing goes, do I need a legit housing, or are there cheaper ways to effectively "splashproof" the camera? (besides buying a k10d)
Seeing as I don't plan on going underwater with it.
Keep in mind that money is an issue, and having already gone down that road, piont and shoot cameras are not an option (already have panasonic fz20).
Thanks |
hey so I can;t give you advice on lenses, but I do have a friend who used his box to dive with and it popped..which wasn;t nice considering he took out a 1D. But of course if you aren;t planning to dive with it, it doesn't need the same water proofing. I'd say go for something that will be waterproof. As I am sure you know, cameras are an expensive hobby.
I'll stop now before I say anything more that is completely self evident.
A.
|
|
|
stringer

Since 31 Jul 2007
694 Posts
Chucktown
Flying Tomato
|
Thu Feb 07, 08 7:38 pm sigma 10-20mm |
|
|
Will the sigma 10-20 work on a film body too?
That would be ridiculously wide! (and probably vignette ridiculously too)
That one is cool because the front element seems less bulbous than the others, so it may not flare as bad on sunny days.
Also, it takes real filters!
For waterproofing, I've seen people on the web have success with modified ammo cases.
That looks pretty easy, but makes using a flash impossible.
|
|
|
Bokeh
Since 07 Feb 2008
104 Posts
Vancouver, WA
Stoked
|
Thu Feb 07, 08 8:32 pm Re: sigma 10-20mm |
|
|
New guy here - first post. Hi everyone!
Unlike Canon EF-S mount Sigma comes as regular EF mount meaning you can use it on full frame digital or film Canon cameras. The ultra wide angle is wicked and the lens is simply outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|