| previous topic :: next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| tinyE 
  Since 21 Jan 2006
 2004 Posts
 not really an
 XTreme Poster
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 6:44 am    The Sandbar |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Those of you who made it out.... let's hear about the sandbar... 
 from the camera, it looks like the sandbar has grown/migrated to cover over 1/2 of the event site... is the camera tricking me?
 
 *EDIT...lol... i just checked, water level is down.... i would say 60% of the Event Site is blocked by our excellent sand bar.... must be Karma...
 
 **Double Edit...here is a pic
 
 
 
		
			|  |  
			|  | sandbar.jpg |  |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| tinyE 
  Since 21 Jan 2006
 2004 Posts
 not really an
 XTreme Poster
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 6:48 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| one more 
 
 
		
			|  |  
			|  | bigsandbar.jpg |  |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| pkh 
  Since 27 Feb 2005
 6549 Posts
 Couve / Hood
 Honored Founder
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 6:51 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I think its mostly the angle, though it does look like its a little bigger at the top. Here's the other cam: 
 
   |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| Mark 
  Since 20 Jun 2005
 3678 Posts
 I need my fix because I'm a
 Naishaholic
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 6:52 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  thats a shame   _________________
 Cleverly disguised as an adult...
 
 www.naishkites.com
 |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| pacifichigh 
  Since 11 May 2005
 1004 Posts
 ATX
 Texan
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 7:02 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I rode HR yesterday and the SB was not as big as it has been.  You could still walk over from the Event Stie, but the outer sandbar stopped right about at the eastern edge of the even site and that was just a sliver. |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| Navanod 
  Since 20 Feb 2007
 207 Posts
 Beaverton
 Stoked
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 7:13 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I also rode yesterday around 1-3 and it wasn't that big! That sucks!   |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| tinyE 
  Since 21 Jan 2006
 2004 Posts
 not really an
 XTreme Poster
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 7:25 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| is that because the water was high? or because it has washed away? |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| Navanod 
  Since 20 Feb 2007
 207 Posts
 Beaverton
 Stoked
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 7:46 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | FlyinElvis wrote: |  	  | is that because the water was high? or because it has washed away? | 
 
 Looks like the water level today is lower than yesterday. Too bad.
 |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| pdxmonkeyboy 
  Since 16 May 2006
 6081 Posts
 forever labled as the
 retired kiter & motorhead Unicorn Master
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 8:31 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | FlyinElvis wrote: |  	  | is that because the water was high? or because it has washed away? | 
 
 Although I'm not sure what the sediment load it like in the Hood River, I would think the presence or absence of the sandbar is mostly a function of the water level as this section of the Columbia (like most) is not subject to highly fluctuating flow rates due to the presence of upstream dams.
 |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| Pepi 
  Since 16 Jun 2006
 1832 Posts
 Pure Stoke Sports
 Shop Owner
 
 CGKA Member
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Wed Mar 28, 07 10:11 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Monkeyboy is correct. 
 The water levels are actually starting to get back to normal.
 (most of the big sandbar images resulted from a low water level this late winter)
 
 By mid-April we should see the water levels likely jump up to what they were last year (that being a bit higher than previous 'normal'  years).
 
 It all depends on what the Spring runoff will bring us, but at this years normal water level, the Sandbar is likely to look a lot like what we had over the weekend (small sandbar, but lots of very shallow water and debris).
 
 Pepi
 _________________
 Pure Stoke Sports
 Hood River, OR
 http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hood-River-OR/2nd-Wind-Sports/35891485558?ref=mf
 www.Purestokesports.com
 |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| kitezilla 
  Since 22 Jun 2006
 453 Posts
 gorge
 Obsessed
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Thu Mar 29, 07 8:05 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Pepi wrote: |  	  | Monkeyboy is correct. 
 lots of very shallow water and debris).
 
 Pepi
 | 
 
 Pepi,
 
 I think you will be correct in your assessment.
 
 Am I the only one who thinks that the debis ("deadheads") should be in some way marked as hazards, not just for the safety of kiters and windsurfers, but also motor boaters?
 
 I was surprised to the lack of responses to my posting of this issue on both this forum and on Kiteforum.
 
 People are already kiting and windsurfing in this area of hidden hazards, so it seems like this issue should be addressed soon!
 
 Here are the links to my 2 posts:
 
 (1)  on NWKite:
 
 http://www.nwkite.com/forums/t-4070-0-asc-30.html
 
 
 (2)  on Kiteforum:
 
 http://www.kiteforum.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=2337376&highlight=
 |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| forrest 
  Since 21 Jun 2005
 4330 Posts
 Hood River
 Hick
 
 CGKA Member
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Thu Mar 29, 07 9:03 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Start saving up your liquid laundry soap bottles and we'll get some marine rope and tie them up.  Most of the small branches that are submersed are pretty soggy and malleable.  It won't be pleasant if you were to landed one, but I think you'd be ok. |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| jack 
 Since 12 Mar 2006
 215 Posts
 
 Stoked
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Thu Mar 29, 07 9:16 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| i think the important one is the huge log that comes out about 20 yards  east of the red bouy but a couple hundred yards closer to the event side |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| tekko 
  Since 20 Feb 2006
 376 Posts
 White Salmon
 Liquid Force
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Thu Mar 29, 07 9:44 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| a couple of us were just talking about that log before the buoy last night. 
 If it is a solid as it looks.. all we need to do is screw in some large eye bolt lags and we have a perfect, easy clip anchor point for the kicker or slider.
 
 Out of the eventsite no fun zone (which right now is really fun!) and launch area and marking  a dangerous log hazard with an easy to see (and fun to hit) park feature, such as a kicker, which people are already used to identifying and avoiding.
 
 Maybe we should, as an earlier post suggested, think very carefully about 'kiter friendly' shaped buoys to mark the edges of the different areas.
 
 We could have an A=frame 'buoy' a kicker 'buoy'  maybe a beginner friendly pyramid 'deathstar buoy'
 
 Multifunctional harmony. We use the need to have markers for areas and hazards coincide with the desires for more park features in the hood.
 |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| sherrybohn 
 Since 16 Jun 2006
 71 Posts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Thu Mar 29, 07 10:49 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| State Marine Board and Marine "Sheriff" is already working on this with the port and Division of State Lands.  The major debrie areas are going to noted on the signs that CGKA & CGWA are proposing. 
 You might want to speak with them (State Marine Board) before you actually "hook" anything to or make plans to "hook" anything like a "kicker"to this stuff.  Believe it or not that "stuff" is considered fish habitate and pretty much off limits except to fish and mother nature.
 |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		| chanson 
  Since 31 Jan 2006
 1874 Posts
 WISCONSIN
 Chimey
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Thu Mar 29, 07 10:55 am |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Quote: |  	  | We could have an A=frame 'buoy' a kicker 'buoy' maybe a beginner friendly pyramid 'deathstar buoy' | 
 
 Nice, I think I remember the "deathstar" from down in Hatteraus a few years bak, pyramid looking kicker...
 
 I agree, if properly marked, we could take advantage of the shallows this year with a "zoned" parkish area..
   |  | 
	
		
		|  | 
	
	
		|  |