 |
|
|
previous topic :: next topic |
| Author |
Message |
shymac
Since 20 Jul 2005
919 Posts
Home Valley, Wa.
Bigfoot
|
|
|
pdxmonkeyboy
Since 16 May 2006
6081 Posts
forever labled as the
retired kiter & motorhead Unicorn Master
|
 Wed Nov 05, 08 4:47 pm |
 |
|
OMFG!! BUSTED !!!! Verbatim cut and paste.
I thought it was a bit, shall we say, sprinkled with a few to many three syllable words for hamlip but I thought I would give him the benefit of the doubt as he probably couldn't sleep last night thinking about all the gays marrying and fornicating, free abortions and illegilization of hand guns that was going to go on when we have a black muzlim terrorist for president.
What a classic example of "I can't think for myself so I'll just parrot what somebody else said"
You, my bible thumping, foil flying, self-rescue practicing channel marker, have been served!!!
_________________
Bury me standing cause I won't lay down!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVvAw2VFR4Y&feature=PlayList&p=FB7233C37686AC79&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=34 |
|
|
Kodiak
Since 01 Aug 2005
1114 Posts
Slidey
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 5:04 pm owned |
|
|
Seriously man, at least go back and edit your original post to give credit to the freak that actually wrote that pile of crap. Plagarism at it's finest.
Nice find Lance  |
|
|
kyle.vh
Since 11 Jul 2007
713 Posts
city of angels
Addicted
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 5:10 pm |
|
|
| SalmonSlayer wrote: | | kyle.vh wrote: | this country owes a debt of gratitude to Nak, and the millions of voters like him who are intellectually honest enough to put country above party.
|
Isn't it a bit intellectually dishonest to assume that the repub's did not vote for obama were putting party above country and are intellectually dishonest?
In my opinion you diminish you argument by making blanket statements such as this which have no basis in truth. |
Actually what I said is quite true, statistically: most voters vote upon party lines. If you want to analyze the corollary of my statement it would be: Are many democratic voters intellectually dishonest and only vote along party lines? (not what you erroneously suggest). And in any case, I do not dispute that nor disagree with it. |
|
|
pdxmonkeyboy
Since 16 May 2006
6081 Posts
forever labled as the
retired kiter & motorhead Unicorn Master
|
|
|
wjb
Since 14 Aug 2007
223 Posts
Nor Cal
Stoked
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 5:51 pm |
|
|
lance_k you rule!!
hamlindp reminds me of a couple guys at our shop that regurgitate Limbaugh and the like without having an original thought rattling around in there heads. Please think before you paste. |
|
|
Chooch
Since 18 Nov 2007
1871 Posts
Wicked Pissah
Boston Tea Bagger
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 6:00 pm |
|
|
Hows this cut and paste? 
David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His book "Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party" was released recently in paperback. To find out more about David Limbaugh, please visit his Web site at www.davidlimbaugh.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.
 |
|
|
eric
Since 13 Jan 2006
1872 Posts
XTreme Poster
|
|
|
pdxmonkeyboy
Since 16 May 2006
6081 Posts
forever labled as the
retired kiter & motorhead Unicorn Master
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 6:32 pm |
|
|
I think I'm going to change my position, after some careful thought I am sincerely worried that if Obama wins, the checks and balances incorporated into our Constitution may not be enough to prevent a radical and irreversible diminution of our individual liberties because a confluence of factors has emerged to create a climate conducive to fundamental change.
These factors are: a shockingly unknown candidate, whose mysterious past and numerous shady alliances are deliberately left unexplored by a corrupt, supportive media; the candidate's charismatic qualities that inspire a cultish loyalty; his intellectual trappings that create a fascination and allure among the intellectual elite, including some hypnotized conservatives; a major financial crisis that exacerbates the people's fears and uncertainties; a largely manufactured cloud of negativity placed over America by the media and a grossly partisan Democratic Party that places its self-interest above the national interest; and an apparently discredited Republican Party and conservative movement that have been blamed for our actual and perceived problems.
All of these could lead to entrusting this man with unprecedented power, giving him a license to operate with minimum scrutiny and an opposition party effectively impotent to oppose his radical blueprint for America.
More than ever, perception is trumping reality. An unprincipled Democratic Party, aided by a morally decadent media, has demonized President Bush, the Republican Party and America itself with distortions and polarizing propaganda designed to dispirit and divide Americans on the bases of race, class and gender. Just look at the domestic and foreign policy picture they have painted the past eight years.
While we are having serious financial problems now, we had a strong economy for most of President Bush's two terms, but the media pushed the Democrats' critique that it was in perpetual recession. As for our real financial crisis, objective observers understand Democratic programs and policies primarily caused it, but Democrats have successfully blamed Republicans for it.
Similarly, despite our problems in Iraq, we are clearly winning there now, but the media are suppressing the good news, just as they have refused to credit Republicans for their wisdom on the surge and protected Democrats from their reckless opposition to it.
The only arrow left in the Democrats' Iraq quiver is to perpetuate their "big lie" that Bush led us into war with lies about WMD. Through stunning and numbing repetition broadcast by a conspiratorial media, they have succeeded in making this the majority narrative, even though anyone who lived through this period knows Democrats supported this policy as long as it was politically expedient, having had access to the exact same intelligence.
Click to learn more...
They've also convinced people, contrary to the facts, that Saddam Hussein didn't have ties to and wasn't abetting our terrorist enemies. And they've completely ignored the many other compelling reasons justifying our bipartisan decision to attack Iraq, including Saddam's persistent and ongoing violations of some 17 U.N. and postwar resolutions and treaties.
Democrats and the media, instead of condemning recalcitrant European nations for not joining the coalition against Iraq despite endless diplomatic overtures by President Bush, falsely indicted the Bush administration for its "unilateral" action against Iraq.
They colluded to publish the slander that the Bush administration sponsored abuses at Abu Ghraib, created inhumane conditions at Gitmo, and routinely tortured enemy prisoners. Democratic presidential candidates Al Gore, John Kerry and Barack Obama have all blithely and falsely accused our troops of atrocities, from systematic torture and prisoner abuse to raping Iraqi civilians to air raiding Afghan villages. They have mischaracterized our essential National Security Agency monitoring of international terrorist communications as domestic spying on little old ladies.
They have portrayed the Bush administration's phenomenal accomplishment of preventing further attacks on our soil since 9/11 not as an administration success but as proof that we no longer face a serious threat.
All of these factors could coalesce to give Obama a mandate to fundamentally move our economy toward socialism in the name of economic fairness and emasculate our war on terrorists in the name of restoring our international image.
Would Obama win if people believed he might well nationalize health care, unilaterally disarm our nuclear weapons, push the Global Poverty Act, appoint judges to the left of Ruth Bader Ginsberg, pass legislation banning handguns, greatly increase federal spending by euphemistically disguising it as a stimulus package, increase taxes on producers and expand "redistribution," impose limitations on private executive salaries, empower labor unions, further nationalize public education with the leftist indoctrination agenda of the National Education Association, further open our borders, ratify the Kyoto climate change treaty, abandon Israel, retreat and surrender in Iraq, dramatically reduce the defense budget, possibly reinstate the draft in the name of racial equity, nationalize our private 401(k) funds, abuse governmental power to target and investigate dissent from ordinary "Joes," and implement the Fairness Doctrine to shut down political dissent from his talk radio critics?
From- David Limbaugh
LMAO, dude, talk about a heart filled with hatred? THAT guy needs to kite.
_________________
Bury me standing cause I won't lay down!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVvAw2VFR4Y&feature=PlayList&p=FB7233C37686AC79&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=34 |
|
|
Chooch
Since 18 Nov 2007
1871 Posts
Wicked Pissah
Boston Tea Bagger
|
|
|
Hein
Since 08 Mar 2005
1314 Posts
Possessed
|
|
|
SalmonSlayer
Since 27 Nov 2005
648 Posts
Addicted
CGKA Member
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 7:28 pm |
|
|
| kyle.vh wrote: | | SalmonSlayer wrote: | | kyle.vh wrote: | this country owes a debt of gratitude to Nak, and the millions of voters like him who are intellectually honest enough to put country above party.
|
Isn't it a bit intellectually dishonest to assume that the repub's did not vote for obama were putting party above country and are intellectually dishonest?
In my opinion you diminish you argument by making blanket statements such as this which have no basis in truth. |
Actually what I said is quite true, statistically: most voters vote upon party lines. If you want to analyze the corollary of my statement it would be: Are many democratic voters intellectually dishonest and only vote along party lines? (not what you erroneously suggest). And in any case, I do not dispute that nor disagree with it. |
Hmmmm
While it is true that most people vote along the party lines that represent their philosophy, that is not what you said.
You said that Nak was intellectually honest enough to put country above party. You can be intellectually honest and vote party lines or jump party lines. Repub or Demo. You would be correct if there was only one intellectually honest choice but there is not. Honor a little diversity here!
You may individually or as as part group that wishes to be included, thank someone for their vote or for shear appreciation for their participation. However, "The country" is full of individuals that do not appreciate a vote that goes against their beliefs and do not "owe a debt of gratitude" to someone who they disagree with. Speaking for the what country owes presumes a lot.
I don't assume that this election choice is for the better. We will see. I personally appreciate the increased participation and interest in this election regardless of who won. I think it has been healty for our country. The best or worst is yet to come. I hope it was the right choice, for everyone's sake
Yes, I know that run-on sentences are a problem for me. Typos and finishing sentences with a preposition are also a deficiency of mine.
I told myself I would limit posts about politics to one day. Life is too short to take this stuff too seriously. You have the last word if you want it. |
|
|
pdxmonkeyboy
Since 16 May 2006
6081 Posts
forever labled as the
retired kiter & motorhead Unicorn Master
|
|
|
Chooch
Since 18 Nov 2007
1871 Posts
Wicked Pissah
Boston Tea Bagger
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 7:37 pm |
|
|
I can hook you up with the right prople in Boston this weekend......  |
|
|
Yardsale
Since 29 Mar 2005
387 Posts
Portlanastan
Obsessed
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 7:45 pm |
|
|
| SalmonSlayer wrote: | | DrewB wrote: | | hamlindp wrote: | | Barack Obama, with his mysterious past and messianic aura, then burst upon the scene with the focused purpose of capitalizing on the public's perceived woes by offering dramatic change and unspecified hope...... |
I didn't have the time to read the whole rant, but this portion caught my eye. I think I know where you are going with this logic: Obama is the anti-Christ .
. |
Nothing from Hamilindp about Anti Christ.
I guess you ignored this statement though.
| Yardsale wrote: | ........oh I should stop thinking out loud! I would have voted for Al Sharpton if it would have gotten Bush and Cheney and their satanic minions out of the oval office. Thank goodness an eloquent, intelligent, and spiritual man such as Obama was available to take the reins.
|
Is it ok To bring up the whole evil thing when it is about Bush Cheney but not Obama?
Like Nak said. "Name calling never changed anyone's mind, or accomplished anything at all useful for that matter." |
Yes it is OK ...they have stand on their actions- a record of lying, non-disclosure, constitutional violations, veiled racism(Iraq war crimes) and religious hippocracy. The worst administration in recent American history(100 yrs)-Fact. Film coming soon to a theatre near you! |
|
|
Moto
Since 03 Sep 2006
2698 Posts
Still a gojo pimp!
Moto Mouth
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 8:10 pm |
|
|
| SalmonSlayer wrote: | | most voters vote upon party lines. |
If you look at political theory and how people vote:
Generally, people do vote on political lines. But what sways people a lot is the economy. If you look at the overall populous vote from four years ago and this year - there is some change, but not as much change as what the electoral vote shows. The majority of the people voted the same way as they did four years ago - however, its people like Nak that is the problem people that can't make up their mind  (I'm kidding bro - I give you respect for the stuff you said and for what you believe in).
_________________
Still rockin gojos, *ssless chaps, and ankle weights! |
|
|
DrewB
Since 16 Aug 2006
385 Posts
PDX
Obsessed
|
| Wed Nov 05, 08 8:19 pm |
|
|
I think we touched a nerve.
I'm not sayin, I'm just sayin.
I'm with Yardsale. Word. |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
