|
previous topic :: next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Hurricane Mike

Since 19 Jun 2006
128 Posts
Stoked
|
|
|
pkh

Since 27 Feb 2005
6549 Posts
Couve / Hood
Honored Founder
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 8:32 am |
|
|
I like the concept of the Fed, and I think the model works, but I still put the blame on Greenpants for all of this.
People were talking about the housing bubble many years ago, then the talk became "subprime mortgages" now its "financial market crisis"
Its really all the same problem, caused by too much free money for too long.
Isn't the Fed's worst enemy supposed to be inflation? Seems to me like housing prices going up 20% a year for many years in a row is some serious inflation.
Then when people's only option is to make the stretch to buy a 500k dollar home because that's all that's available in places like California. They go for the adjustable rate mortgage because its a damn good deal at the time (and their only affordable option)... then interest rates start to return to normal levels... Of course they will default.
I'm glad through all of this recent carnage they didn't lower interest rates. Okay take over ownership of the empty houses until some day they can sell for a reasonable price... but don't continue the problem by supporting an over inflated housing market with super low interest rates.
|
|
|
Spike

Since 13 May 2007
1414 Posts
Alameda
Spelling Expert
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 8:34 am |
|
|
welcome to
 |
| |
nwpolitcs.JPG |
|
|
|
registered

Since 12 Jul 2005
1319 Posts
tsunami
Sandbagger
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 8:36 am |
|
|
our government spends 100 dollars for every 10 dollars they hope to make next year....your right vote in some bigger government options...
don't let competition guide markets let ignorance rule....
the world is affraid of us failing otherwise we would be screwed...
our government does lots of great services however there is lots of waste..lots.
when the bridges we used to build pay out 125 million for construction and the company profits 80+ million of it ....hmmmm
every heard of weopons contracts ..theres ssome overpriced stuff.
think Iran pays full price for the same stuff
I am no economist ..but ignorance and bliss are not the combined answer folks.
don't retire if you can you need to keep paying income tax help your big brother out.
|
|
|
blowhard
Since 26 Dec 2005
2027 Posts
Windward
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 9:33 am need for greed |
|
|
other downturns where so much shorter
by allowing the people at the top who overindulged TO
lose everything (instead of giving gov. handouts)
the new deal and other socialist BS
just strung it out for a much longer time.
The obscene reality is that if the top producers are losing
so are we
|
|
|
brass
Since 15 Jul 2006
152 Posts
Stoked
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 11:38 am Re: need for greed |
|
|
The obscene reality is that if the top producers are losing
so are we[/quote]
Man somewhere some "fiscal conservative" needs to come up with a new concept. I am still waiting for the Reagonomics trickle down to hit me with something other than the piss that it is.
need less.
|
|
|
Moto

Since 03 Sep 2006
2698 Posts
Still a gojo pimp!
Moto Mouth
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 11:45 am |
|
|
| jack wrote: | | I blame it on Best for destroying the secondary kite market... |
I blame the kite companies for making me broke from buying all their stuff
_________________ Still rockin gojos, *ssless chaps, and ankle weights! |
|
|
Moto

Since 03 Sep 2006
2698 Posts
Still a gojo pimp!
Moto Mouth
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 11:46 am |
|
|
Would you rather nwshithole with another kiteme or blowme episode?
_________________ Still rockin gojos, *ssless chaps, and ankle weights! |
|
|
colby
Since 23 Apr 2005
613 Posts
Celebrity
Photographer
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 12:23 pm |
|
|
good discussion... Would be interested to know the breakdown of where a 1 trillion dollar bailout would really come from (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13602.html) ...what % is paid out on any loans taken from which countries, how it hits a taxpayer, etc.
..and isn't the US bankrupt, or at least technically? Couldn't imagine running a business the way the government does it and lasting more than a week, and they don't seem far off of the firms they are bailing out.
In hindsight, Bloomberg or even Romney might have been better VP picks, especially for the repubs this election.
_________________ www.WestRoots.com |
|
|
blowhard
Since 26 Dec 2005
2027 Posts
Windward
|
Fri Sep 19, 08 1:22 pm Re: need for greed |
|
|
| brass wrote: | The obscene reality is that if the top producers are losing
so are we |
Man somewhere some "fiscal conservative" needs to come up with a new concept. I am still waiting for the Reagonomics trickle down to hit me with something other than the piss that it is.
need less.[/quote]
NEED LESS
big words
hard to imagine
for most .
The dudes who are ringing this bill up are not the ones who are gonna pay it off.
My kids will
You don't mind working a 110+ days to pay yer taxes do you?
"If you think you own something ,stop paying your taxes"
I love this freedom imagine this discussion in ???
china russia ,,,,
knock knock
|
|
|
eli_anderson

Since 04 Jun 2007
507 Posts
Addicted
|
Sat Sep 20, 08 1:04 pm |
|
|
| voodo economics...call up Perot again...is he still alive?
|
|
|
trevorsmith

Since 25 Apr 2005
501 Posts
PDX
Addicted
|
Mon Sep 22, 08 1:49 pm |
|
|
a financial person said on TV last night said something interesting:
The AIG buyout is one of the best business deals I have ever seen.
85 billion dollars for 80% of AIG..I think that is a good deal.
AIG assets top $1 trillion so even if AIG fails we should be able to get $85 billion back out of liquidation.
|
|
|
colby
Since 23 Apr 2005
613 Posts
Celebrity
Photographer
|
Mon Sep 22, 08 2:00 pm |
|
|
I believe that deal is structured in favor of the FED as the incentive is on AIG NOT to borrow the full 80 billion amount. It's basically a lifeline. If AIG wants to use it then they can by a specific date and then the FED has an option to take a % of AIG.
The trillion dollar figure they are talking about now is buying up the sub prime mortgages that got hit and is in a whole other ballpark as they are essentially asking to put 800 billion+ in the control of one person, and in the language of the proposal they want NO oversight or review whatsoever. Nice maneuver! Check this language...
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."
no wind up here in the North...can't you tell??
_________________ www.WestRoots.com |
|
|
tstansbury

Since 06 Jun 2006
649 Posts
Rowena and P.C
Addicted
|
Mon Sep 22, 08 2:07 pm |
|
|
| Someone at the summit in Oklahoma with Blumeberg called are fiscal policies "fiscal child abuse" I thought that was a great statement.
|
|
|
chanson

Since 31 Jan 2006
1874 Posts
WISCONSIN
Chimey
|
Mon Sep 22, 08 2:09 pm |
|
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26837854
some more literature for those who feel inspired
crazy to think how "loose" everyone(investors, banks, etc.) was when buying/selling all these portfolios... I guess they didn't think it would come to an end..?
_________________ Shallow Dive Design, 2nd Wind Sports, Airush, Trident Sports |
|
|
gabe
Since 16 May 2005
491 Posts
Obsessed
|
Mon Sep 22, 08 2:14 pm |
|
|
jake, as a loan officer didn't you create a bunch of this bad debt yourself
| chanson wrote: | http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26837854
some more literature for those who feel inspired
crazy to think how "loose" everyone(investors, banks, etc.) was when buying/selling all these portfolios... I guess they didn't think it would come to an end..?  |
|
|
|
colby
Since 23 Apr 2005
613 Posts
Celebrity
Photographer
|
|
|
|