|
previous topic :: next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pkh

Since 27 Feb 2005
6549 Posts
Couve / Hood
Honored Founder
|
|
|
pkh

Since 27 Feb 2005
6549 Posts
Couve / Hood
Honored Founder
|
|
|
Kataku2k3

Since 14 Aug 2005
3754 Posts
PDX-LA
Videographer
|
Wed Jun 11, 08 8:04 am |
|
|
Damn! Just like an HVX! Definately cool for $200. Would be worth checking out, just to see the quality.
EDIT: Just checked on Vimeo, and they don't have this model... at least from my quick search, but the Aiptek A-HD (older version), which is only 1280x720 looks okay. Everyone talks about the shitty image stabilization and audio, but you can tell it's an HD cam. |
|
|
hamlindp

Since 09 Feb 2007
358 Posts
I aint no lawnmowin' pump kite parker, I'm that dadgum
Channel Marker
|
Wed Jun 11, 08 9:52 am |
|
|
But what about the lame 3x optical zoom?
Adam, what do you think? _________________ (>====<|> ---< |
|
|
Kataku2k3

Since 14 Aug 2005
3754 Posts
PDX-LA
Videographer
|
Wed Jun 11, 08 10:02 am |
|
|
| To screw around with and not really care about... yeah. For a primary cam, I wouldn't. I'm sure you could make some decent stuff with it, but you'd have to be very careful when filming (probably using a tripod and closer up). MOV isn't going to take as much processing power to edit when compared to HDV and especially my cam's AVCHD, so that's a plus! |
|
|
hebrew_hammer

Since 27 Dec 2006
31 Posts
|
Wed Jun 11, 08 1:31 pm |
|
|
yea we have that cam at the shop. Its ok, sweet that it does 60 fps, but yea its super shakey.....but when you can hold it still it looks pretty good. but for 200 bucks who cares. _________________ Commit legit. |
|
|
pkh

Since 27 Feb 2005
6549 Posts
Couve / Hood
Honored Founder
|
|
|
|